Idwell on Service Management

Thoughts on how to design and implement IT Service Management

Paul Leenards


Leave a comment

ITIL3 is a teenager

I like analogies. They are useful to explain a complex thought in a different way and help to gain understanding. This morning I’ve started to write the text for a factsheet we want to publish on ITIL3 in relation to ITIL2. And I was considering an analogy. Since maturity is a concept we like to work with (hence http://www.itmaturity.com) I toyed with that idea. I realized that ITIL3 is like a teenager. It has grown up since the previous versions (1, the baby, and 2, the child), but it isn’t mature yet. Although it likes to think otherwise. It has found it can now use new possibilities and functions that were already there in potential. And it hasn’t yet used the full potential.

As a teenager ITIL3 has pimpels and is a little too corpulent. That might have been caused by the hamburgers it is eating lately. It is very concerned with pocket money to buy the latest gadgets and fashionable loud music. ITIL3 is both attractive and repelling. Pretty to look at, but the nonsense it is uttering…. oh, please! The rebellious side is well developed and irritating. Its enthusiastic approach to life(cycles) is contagious. It lacks social skills and experience. It thinks that structures are the way forward.

You can tell that I both have a like and a dislike of ITIL3. Looking at the framework from one perspective, it offers a lot for the IT organization. From the other perspective there is still a lot to improve. I’m curious if there are other analogies to be made. Or this analogy to be improved.

Paul Leenards


Leave a comment

IT Industry Standards

Last week I had an interesting discussion during the ITSMF e-Symposium on Service Automation. In the America Session the question was asked if the IT industry is not too young to have a best practice framework like ITIL. You could argue that there hasn’t been enough experience within the IT community to have best (or good) practices defined as such. Although I can understand the perspective, in comparison to for instance Finance the IT industry is quite young, I do not agree with the conclusion: As long as there is a constant study on the best practices in IT there is a place for IT Industry Standards. After a while these Standards will stabilize and become more common knowledge. The recent addition to the ITIL set of Continual Service Improvement is exactly what you need to establish these Industry Standards.

What is needed is an Academic forum for the studies of IT Service Management where the IT Industry Standards can be further developed. At the moment there is this ongoing discussion on all kind of platforms between Vendors and Users on what is the best standard. And with this discussion acquisitions of bias are always close: vendors want to sell their products and services and users want simple and cheap solutions in a box. A more independent platform is needed and Universities can play an important role here. There are already some Universities that are getting involved, hopefully the number will increase.